canon extender ii vs iii

Because the Canon EF 2x III Extender is multiplying the aberrations/flaws of the lens it is mounted behind by 2x and because there are now 9 Given the speed of the car and relatively low shutter speed for such speed, the AF tracking was clearly having no troubles. Anomalous dispersion glass elements are used in the Series III extenders to reduce chromatic aberration and increase resolution and contrast. What is your point? The lens and extender combo can always be used in manual focus mode, but a narrow max aperture (f/11 for the f/5.6 lenses) https://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/1296858/0#12372013, https://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/1002804, https://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/1334727/1#12733577, https://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/1460120, http://i160.photobucket.com/albums/t172/Paddywacked/Fred%20Miranda/7D__4843_zpsj3c1igvf.jpg, http://www.pbase.com/liquidstone/image/131920218/original, http://www.pbase.com/liquidstone/image/72483366/original.jpg, http://www.pbase.com/liquidstone/image/145804734/original.jpg, http://www.pbase.com/liquidstone/image/144892044/original.jpg, http://www.pbase.com/liquidstone/image/146201228/original.jpg. The extenders do not have provisions to update their firmware to accommodate new lenses, AFAIK. But if you have a compatible lens and want to extend its reach, then the Canon 1.4x Extender II is definitely worth considering! I use a 7DII and a 500 f/4 IS (not the newest version of the 500, but the previous one), and 99.9% for birds. The series III extender results are the last set (with 1.4x III and with 2x III) of focal lengths available for each lens. Unlike the 1.4x, the 2X has always had a noticeable detrimental effect on image quality. IMG8 = new Image(604, 404) There is very little difference to be seen in these samples but as I mentioned before , I feel that in my real world shots the MKIII was very slightly ahead in contrast at lower apertures. IMG12 = new Image(600, 404) The new mark iii 1.4x teleconverter is head and shoulders above the previous versions. Sharpness is much improved over previous versions. Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L USM Lens In terms of performance, the Canon Extender EF 1stops down one stop when attached to most lenses1stop on telephoto lenses), meaning that youll need more light than usual in order to take photos without increasing ISO too much2). Always check the Lens Specifications and Measurements Tool for the most update-to-date compatibility specs. If you have read the Canon 1.4x EF Extender III Review, you will find the Canon EF 2x III Extender review familiar. Heres a quick compatibility chart to help you out. The 2xIII works nicely on the 70-200II however focusing speed is reduced by 50% so be aware of that. Well worth the upgrade. Results with the Extender 2x III are overall slightly sharper than the Extender 2x II with a difference being most noticeable in the mid-frame and corner areas. 03/28/2023: New firmware version 1.0.3.1 is available for, 03/14/2023: New firmware version 1.8.1 is available for, 01/18/2023: New firmware version 1.1.1 is available for, 01/09/2023: Help ensure your autofocus is properly aligned with a, 12/08/2022: New firmware version 1.0.5.1 is available for, 12/07/2022: New firmware version 1.7.0 is available for, 11/16/2022: We're thrilled to be ranked among the, 08/31/2022: New firmware version 1.1.1 is available for, 08/09/2022: New firmware version 1.2.0 is available for, 07/14/2022: New firmware version 1.0.1 is available for, 06/07/2022: New firmware version 1.3.2 is available for, 05/26/2022: New firmware version 1.0.5.1 is available for, 05/26/2022: New firmware version 1.0.3.1 is available for, 05/10/2022: Keep your Canon gear in optimal condition with a, 05/05/2022: We are excited to announce that we have refreshed the, 03/23/2022: New firmware version 1.0.3.1 is available for. A 1.4x extender will decrease your maximum aperture by 1 stop. Well, it really depends on what youre looking for. Canon EF 500mm f/4L IS II USM Lens and And I'm sure that not everyone can justify the cost difference to go with the 2x III over the 2x II. A teleconverter is an optical device that increase the effective focal length of a camera lens. zoom L lenses with at least 70mm of focal length on their wide end (the Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6L IS USM Lens excluded). Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more and all is free. when used with the Canon IS Supertelephoto Series II lenses mentioned above and (I expect) all future compatible lenses. Weve got you covered with this handy compatibility chart. MKIII on the left and MKII on the right. Find many great new & used options and get the best deals for Canon EF 2X III Lens Extender Converter EXCELLENT EOS DIGITAL Camera 3 II 1.4x at the best online prices at eBay! The lens release button on the MKIIIs is also larger than on the previous version and it feels a lot nicer under the thumb in operation. The Canon EF 2x III Extender increases the physical length of any combination it is used I have a suitable 70-200 L lens, but noticed that the older II versions are considerably cheaper. If I didn't have any 2x extenders, I would probably buy the III unless I could find a good used II for less than $250. The 2x III adds a small amount of barrel distortion to the lens it is being used with. It multiplies your focal length by 1.4x and makes your effective aperture one stop less. To the best of my knowledge the contrast AF in the R Series does not have this AF system downshift at all. Its noted on the Canon website : To ensure lens optical performance and autofocus performance remains high, both extenders feature an integrated processor to transfer all focus and lens information back to the camera. There is a noticeable difference between the EF and RF 2x TCs on the EF 600/4 II, with the EF 2xIII delivering sharper results in the center and periphery. Ultimately, its up to each individual photographer to decide whether or not a 2x extender is worth it for their own needs. Canon EF 600mm f/4L IS II USM Lens. I have a 1dxii and a 400mm 5.6L. -EF 28-70mm f/2.8L USM Even at F/4 IQ is very good.IQ with Extender 2xIII is affected. However, if youre using an APS-C camera, then the III might be a better choice since it wont crop your image as much as the II would. These are the facts, now you have to figure out how to get around these problems. This one used an EOS 5D Mark III + EF 1.4X III + Sigma 120-300mm f/2.8 DG OS HSM Sport: Both of the following images were captured using a Canon EOS 6D + EF 2X III + Sigma 120-300mm f/2.8 DG OS HSM Sport. And as stated he didn't say thats the lens he would be using the TC with. My personal opinion is that the 2x III's improvements are worth the difference in price, but we all value our images and money differently. L's 35-350 , 70-200 MK II IS Sports and wildlife are two of the most common photography pursuits utilizing extenders. Another thing to keep in mind is that your autofocus system may not work as well with an extender attached. Tools. I personally think that with my current camera the 1.4TC is a better choice for this lens. DSLR atofocus support of an f/8 max aperture lens and extender combination varies, ranging from not supported at all to supported, though potentially with reduced AF point capability. Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM Lens The 2x on the other hand is only worth having if you cannot get the same shot in another way. Its almost totally clean ! I wrote about the MII 2x extender here before, so you might want to take a quick look at that for a couple of samples as well. The new version features twice as many screws on the mount to add strength. Dan is an editorial, commercial and fine art photographer based in the Canadian Yukon. I could not see an appreciable difference in the AF speed and accuracy at all when used with current lenses. If youre a Canon shooter, then youre likely aware of the Canon 1.4x Extender II. Image of the Canon 2x III Extender. The first task I undertook upon purchasing (retail) my 2x III was to add the with-extender-III ISO 12233 resolution chart results Starts improving from F/6.3 onwards till F/8.This leads to high ISO but used with R5 or R6 this will not lead to noise issues as these two mirrorless bodies handle high ISO very well as being reported. The image below was captured with a Canon EOS 5D Mark III + EF 2X III + Sigma 120-300mm f/2.8 DG OS HSM Sport. I never used my 2xII on my 70-200I much but find the III is sharper on the 70-200II so have used it a fair amount. -- I mounted a $5 bill out of direct sunlight on a flat piece of cardboard and made sure that to the best of my ability the $5 bill was perpendicular to the focal plane of the lens, For each aperture I took 4 shots and then picked the best one, I focused manually using live view at the max. Using extenders to save space when traveling or hiking can be a good decision. Two additional lenses in the same number of groups (9/5 vs. 7/5) are found in the III (and likely contribute to the slightly increased weight). I believe it will also autofocus faster with certain newer lenses like the 70-200f/2.8L II IS and the II Super Telephotos. I traded in the 1.4 EX Mark II towards the purchase of the Mark III. Canon EF 1200mm f/5.6L USM Lens. This may seem like a drawback, but in reality subject tracking performance remains quite high when Series III Extenders are used with IS II lenses. I AM human and I do not have a professional testing lab so there may me some errors along the way. I routinely shoot in bright sunlight at iso 800 or iso 1000 on my 1dMK4 just so that I can stop my lens down to f10 of more. But I notice no slow down in AF on the new 70-200 mk II . A great lens will typically produce the best image quality when used with the 2x and I find the AF slows significantly using the 2x on the 70-200II in less than bright conditions. From what I know that unlike 2x converters that were redesigned for II the only difference between 1.4x I and II is a bit more of black paint for that extra 'I' .Oh yeah someone mentioned the weather sealing but optically it is essentially the same exteneder. The biggest downside to using a 2x extender, in my opinion, is the image quality reduction it causes. TS-E Lenses: All Canon EF 2.0X III Telephoto Extender for Canon Super Telephoto Lenses (Renewed) Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L is II USM Lens, Lens Only VILTROX C-AF 2X II TELEPLUS 2.0X Teleconverter Auto Focus Telephoto Extender Lens Converter for Canon EF Mount Super Telephoto Lens 70-200mm 100-400mm and DSLR Camera 80D 5DII And, that's pretty much it. You are using an out of date browser. The latest version of the Extender EF 2x III, on the other hand, is compatible with all current Canon EF mount lenses except for two: the EF 400mm f/2.8L IS II USM and the EF 600mm f/4L IS II USM. The image quality of lenses varies from model to model; and therefore, the optical results of the various with-extender combinations also vary. Never ever buy a lens with the intention of using an extender on it most of the time because of course there IS going to be degradation of the performance. So after reading your post, I am confused as I am a beginner and do not yet understand some of the jargon. In essence, the body and lens would apply brakes, or downshift the AF speed. In the above photo the car is coming at me at at least 150MPH. Apart from that though there is little difference on the outside. "As with previous EF Extenders, usage of Series III EF Extenders lowers AF drive speed to improve AF performance. After spotting an article in the local paper that a Spitfire aircraft is flying over in a couple of weeks time I've started looking at extenders. The EF 70-300 mm f/4-5.6L IS USM isn't even designed to be able to use any tele converter. function switchimage(imgDocID, imgObjName) { Like the 2x II, the Canon EF 2x III Extender is weather-sealed and very-solidly-built - The minimum focus distance of this lens is 95cm, giving you the ability to get close to your subject matter while still being able to frame them perfectly in the shot. Note though that this is some beautiful light I am shooting in! While I could see a minor improvement in sharpness and barely perceptibly less vignetting, I decided my $500 was better spent toward a new lens or new body. The huge focal length increase of course comes with some penalties, including a modest financial cost, some size and weight addition and Carrying a 300mm and 2x for example is a great weight saver over taking a 600mm lens. as you can see below, there are now 7 (instead of 4) screws holding the rear lens mount to the body. Here is an example of the focal length increase provided by the 1.4x and 2x extenders. So if youre looking for a way to extend the reach of your lenses, the Canon 1.4 Extender III is definitely worth considering. Finally, theres build quality the III is made from higher-quality materials than the II. Canon EF 300mm f/2.8L IS USM Lens But, saving money is one of the reasons to buy an extender instead of a lens with a longer native focal length. How big are the improvements between the different versions of this extender? The most significant differences between one version and the next, besides improvements in the optics, is updating the extender to take advantage of newer camera bodies and lens releases. I would however use an extender if the sun is off at 90 degrees to my subject or more. Canon extenders simply do not fit behind the rear lens element on Canon's non-extender-compatible lenses. How big are the improvements between the different versions of this extender? Canon Extender EF 1.4X III Teleconverter -Near Mint- #62 4960999664828 | eBay IMG11.src = 'https://media.the-digital-picture.com/Images/Other/Canon-Extender-EF-III/Canon-Extender-EF-1.4x-III-On-Camera.jpg' Canon EF 180mm f/3.5L USM Macro Lens becomes a 360mm f/7.1 USM Macro Lens. to all of the current extender-compatible lenses. But which extender is compatible with which lens? CANON 5D MK3, EF 24-70mm 2.8 L, EF 70-200mm 2.8 IS L II, EX580 II. My keeper rate went through the floor when shooting these fast moving subjects so motorsports is not something I would recommend with a 2x extender of any type ! (again, use the mouseover feature) usually improves the image quality of both the bare lens and the extended lens combination. Canon EF 70-200mm f/4.0L IS USM Lens The important thing is to experiment and find what works best for you and your subject. Super Spectra coatings were introduced to help reduce ghosting and flare as well as fluorine coating to make water spots and finer prints easier to remove. -A list of all compatible Canon lenses | All content Dan Carr - As an Amazon Associate Dan earns from qualifying purchases. I did some systematic test shots of a Coke can, two at 400mm and two at 300mm, with my new Canon 100-400mm mark ii lens and there was virtually ZERO difference between the shots with vs without the 1.4 - it was impressive! It really depends on your needs. Well discuss how it works, what its made of, and how well it performs in real-world scenarios. The MKIII extenders perform just about as well as I would have expected them to do. Of course, there are some trade-offs when using an extender. Lets take a look at another sample that was shot with the 1.4x MKIII, Canon 1dMK4 , iso 1250, f5.6, 1/500 , 420mm, 100% crop from above image with 1.4x MKIII extender. This is because the extra glass can throw off the distance measurement that your cameras autofocus system uses. Its a great way to extend the reach of your lenses, and its also very affordable. Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM Lens The lens extender is impervious to nearly all weather extremes thanks to rubber gasket seals. an extension tube installed between them makes the fit possible. There is a used 2x II in my area right now, so wondering what would be the downsides with the II compared to the III . DSLR cameras will continue to calculate auto exposures properly when used with Canon Extenders. In 2020 Canon also announced Extenders for the R system - the Extender RF 1.4x and Extender RF 2x. The Canon EF 2x III Extender significantly extends the reach of your sharp, compatible Canon lenses for a relatively low size, weight, and financial cost - For my winter ski work I take the 300mm and extenders because I simply could not ski all day with a 600mm on my back. Canon 1dMK4 , iso1250 , f11, 1/1000 , 420mm. If youre a Canon shooter, then you know that the Canon 1.4 Extender III is one of the best lens adapters on the market. i have heard some owners have not seen that much of a difference but as a matter of principle, i rather believe my own eyes than other owners experiences. counter the pincushion distortion to a small extent. For that kind of scenario the 2x is still worth having but use it wisely ! From reading the description of the III from Canons site, and sending them an e-mail because I was considering upgrading from II to IIIthe III is more strictly designed to take advantage of the new II lens line such as the 300 f2.8 II or the 70-200 f2.8 II etc. Thats all it is, a bit of fun. with by 2.08" (52.7mm) and increases the weight by 12 oz (325g). IMG12.src = 'https://media.the-digital-picture.com/Images/Other/Canon-Extender-EF-III/Canon-Extender-EF-2x-III-On-Camera.jpg' The most important factor is the type of camera you have. Compared to the Mark II Extenders, these new Mark III Extenders will offer increased AF performance with all EF lenses. The III's new color matches Canon's latest white L lenses. A 2x extender will decrease your maximum aperture by 2 stops. The Canon extenders have a protective rubber ring around the front element to protect both the extender itself The Canon Extender EF 1.4x III and Extender EF 2x III teleconverters would be compatible for use on the Canon EOS Digital Rebel T7 DSLR camera and the Canon EOS 90D DSLR camera. Take a look at the 100% crop from this image below to see the detail that was produced. That can be very useful for wildlife or sports photography when you want to get just a little closer without spending money on an entirely new and longer lens. Not my current 7D unless I feel like manual focusing.Thanks! Stopping the lens down one to two stops Much the same story here with the 2x extenders. Caution Do not attach two or more Extenders on the same camera. I have no experience with either 2.0 Extender. Will be coupled with EF 300mm f/4 L IS and a 7D Mark II -- maybe sometimes with an EF 70-200 f/4L IS and same body. More testing will confirm, but I've been testing with a pair of 2X converters stacked, and AF seems fast and accurate. Im sure there will be differences in other parts of the frame as well but if you want to pixel peep every little bit then head on over to The Digital Picture where Brian has all that stuff. As such, its often best to switch to manual focus when using an extender. In order to maintain backward firmware compatibility, a performance ceiling must be established. http://www.dpreview.com/news/1008/10082611canonef14xiiief2xiii.asp, they have new optics and new processors for improved lens/camera communications. This will help combat the AF speed reduction and finally ALWAYS stop the lens down further than you would do in that same situation of you were NOT using the extender. This teleconverter will also decrease the sharpness of your images due to added optics, so its best used when shooting at lower resolutions or for less critical applications. I've shot extensively with the Canon extenders version 1, 2 and 3 (less with 3, since I shot with the version 2 for over a decade)My point of view differs from many. IMG1.src = 'https://media.the-digital-picture.com/Images/Other/Canon-Extender-EF-III/No-Extender.jpg' In this post, well be taking a detailed look at the Canon Extender EF 1.4X III. So there you have it a quick guide on how to use Canons 1.4x extenders! 03/30/2023: New firmware updates are available. But if youre on a budget, the Canon 1.4 Extender II is still a very good lens that will serve you well. Another good reason to use an extender is to create a longer focal length lens than is available natively. Not an expert but I asked the same question a couple of years ago.the II is well worth buying over the Ihandled AF better etc. In the Fall of 2010 Canon announced the introduction of new MKIII extenders to replace the previous MKII versions. -EF 100-300mm f/5..6L USM Adding a Canon 1.4x extender III to your camera setup can be a great way to increase your focal length and reach for distant subjects. The lens mount pin and lens mount stopper pin are improved for higher endurance and, -(older) versionsofthe following: The only advantage would be in the weather sealing arena. Entdecke Canon Extender EF 1.4X III Telekonverter - fast neuwertig - #104 in groer Auswahl Vergleichen Angebote und Preise Online kaufen bei eBay Kostenlose Lieferung fr viele Artikel! Extender Model: 1.4x II: 2x II: 1.4x III: 2x III: 1.4x II: 2x II: 1.4x III: 2x III: Actual Aperture: f/5.6: f/8: f/5.6 . The new mark iii 1.4x teleconverter is head and shoulders above the previous versions. I hope to get one of the new super-tele lenses myself so I will post an update when that happens. Great link, thanks! Canon EF Lenses: All except for the EF 50mm f/1.8 II and EF 85mm f/1.2L USM Image quality from stacked extenders will not be great. IMG6 = new Image(604, 404) I don't use extenders a big percentage of the time, but I often have a 1.4x with me. Because of that, most people only use Extenders when they absolutely need the extra reach AND have plenty of light to work with (like outdoors during the daytime). EF 1.4x III and EF2x III extenders are recommended for use with EOS . 5 U SM EFS 17 ~ 85 mmf ,f 4 . Canon EF 400mm f/2.8L IS USM Lens Each has its pros and cons, so it really comes down to what youre looking for in a lens. I'm much happier with 2-stops-down 2x III results than wide open results. so the MM (Maximum Magnification) of the lens is also multiplied by 2x. Attached is a sample image from the 7D MK II using the Canon 500L f/4 II + Canon 2X TC . Extender 2x Mk II vs. 2x Mk III. by Dan Carr | Aug 29, 2011 | Gear Check, Lenses. At review time, the price differential between the still-available version II extenders and the version IIIs is rather high. That would cost you only one stop,making your lenses a much more manageablef/5.6. Why did Canon redesign it (if they did)? Since many Canon EOS camera bodies need a max aperture of f/5.6 or wider to autofocus, losing 2 stops of max aperture pushes f/4 and narrower lenses past their ability to autofocus. So if you have a crop sensor camera or one of Canons mirrorless cameras, youll need to look elsewhere for an extender solution. f/4 on a tripod, and shot at an item about 50' away. As for the improved optics, most reviewers have indicated that the difference in IQ between the 1.4x II and III is pretty slight, while the difference between the 2x II and III is more noticeable. Thanks. IMG3 = new Image(604, 404) This gives me a 560mm f/5.6 option, and an 800mm f/8. Improvements in the Series III extenders promise to perform especially well on these specific lenses. My overall impression of the new MKIII 1.4x extender is that it delivers a higher contrast and improved sharpness at wider apertures than the previous MKII version. http://www.dpreview.com/news/1008/10082611canonef14xiiief2xiii.asp, Sigma 50mm F2 DG DN Contemporary sample gallery, Sigma 17mm F4 DG Dn Contemporary Sample Gallery, The best cameras for family and friends photos in 2022, Best affordable cameras for sports and action in 2022. The above images (of a Christmas Cactus flower) were taken from the same tripod-mounted position (using the tripod ring) with a and the lens it is being inserted into if your alignment is off when mounting the extender to a compatible lens. Canon EF 2x Extender II it replaces. I used to use my MKII 2x a lot less frequently than my 1.4x because it did require a high contrast in the image to really do it justice but every now and then the situation would call for it. Others might find that the drop in sharpness isnt worth the extra reach. Canon EF 500mm f/4.5 L USM Lens Canon 1D-Series: The 1.4 extender iii is compatible with all cameras in the 1D series. Canon EF 135mm f/2.0L USM Lens The 2X TC II never worked at all well for me so I sold it years ago. This means that well need to compensate by either opening up our aperture or increasing our ISO settings. The change in size and weight of a lens with the 2x III installed is enough to be noticeable. So if you attach a 1.4x Extender to that same 100mm lens at /2.8, it will now be /4- not as bright as it was before. If youre looking for an easy way to get closer to your subject matter without spending a lot of money on a new lens, then the Canon Extender EF 1 4X III could be a great option for you8). -EF 75-300mm f/4-.5-.6III USM } The new mark iii 1.4x teleconverter is head and shoulders above the previous versions. EF 28-90 , 28 @ 2.8 , 50 @1.8 , 28-135 IS Accordingly, overall AF performance remains essentially unchanged with an EF Extender attached, versus the lenss AF speed without an extender.". If you have an IS Mark II super-tele then it apparently makes the focusing more accurate. The 2X III just hunts on my 35-350 L . Image editing and C&C always OK